Sunday, September 28, 2008
the debate: McCain beat the shit out of obama on foreign policy. But that only constituted half of the debate, which was supposed to be entirely on foreign policy. half of it was spent on the economy and domestic policy, something the democrats claim they are strong (and socialist) on. this should've been mccain's night of glory, but it didnt end up that way at all. i think that one of the two upcoming presidential-nominee debates should be made open to more foreign policy questions to replace those missed on this last debate. Im disgusted by some americans. the fact that they will defend obama's idealistic, naive, and ultimately dangerous foreign policy will come back to hit them in the ass if obama is elected. the fact that they think its ok to sit down w/o preconditions with a man who denies the Holocaust and has repeatedly threatened to wipe Israel off the face of the earth shows in bright colors how stupid some people are. Really. Im not gonna say "i respect their opinion" b/c i dont. I think theyre idiots for defending that policy. Complete idiots. This is shown by Biden, who said earlier that the world will have to come to terms with a nuclear Iran. What an asshole. Instead of stopping their nuclear development, obama and biden will allow it to grow. I won't stand for that. I don't think Americans should stand for that.
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Hypocrites
When obama calls this economic crisis "the worst since the Great Depression" all the Dem's and Liberals agree with him and back him up. However, when mccain and palin compare the two crises then the Democrats say "THIS IS NOT ANYTHING LIKE THE GREAT DEPRESSION". the fact that mccain is DOING HIS JOB as a senator and going back to DC to help find the solution is honorable. obama had the audacity (one of his favorite words) to say the debate tmw is more important then finding a solution for the economic crisis facing our nation. unlike mccain, obama will never put country first. he will do anything to get his face on the tv but wont lift a darn finger to do his freaking job, go to DC, and help find the solution. Bush had to INVITE him in order for obama to wisen up and do his job as senator. apparently he has forgotten that. after all, he's too worried bout being "citizen of the world." this is obama: bombastic bullshit. Liberals and David Letterman complain that mcCain skipped letterman's show to go to a katie couric interview. if obama did that every Dem would commend his decision. but mccain? of course not! how could he skip a liberal show and go to a serious interview! *insert buckets of sarcasm* couric interviewed biden and palin this wk as well. so mccain took the opportunity and got an interview with her as well. biden made a huge blunder with couric- he has a big mouth and doesn't know when to shut up. He was talking about the Great Depression and how "roosevelt went on television right after the 1929 stock market crash to comfort americans,etc." ummmm senator biden, u obviously dont know history...or have common sense. that was Hubert Hoover who did that. and it wasnt on television, on account of it didnt exist then....
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
The US, Israel, Colombia, Georgia, etc. should all resign from the UN. The organization is dominated by Arab countries hostile to Western values and supportive of terror networks. The UN did not lift a finger during the Rwanda genocide nor the current Darfur one. They did not do anything during Hussein's genocide against Iraqi Kurds. And they have not done anything to stop Iran from sponsoring terror networks and creating nuclear weapons. I am deeply and tremendously furious at the fact Ahmadinejad is currently on American soil (at the UN conference in NYC). He should have never been allowed in the country of the brave and heroic American soldiers who were killed by Ahmadinejad's funneling of money into terrorist organizations. Not surprisingly, Ahmadinejad bashed Israel and America with the usual "Zionist blah blah" bullshitt during his speech today. I wish I could have joined the protesters outside the UN building, where Holocaust survivors and Nobel prize winners protested Ahmadinejad's presence. It would be nice to see Ahmadinejad arrested and sent to Gitmo for some "pleasant treatment."
on a completely different note, life kind of sucks when the person you like so much will never know it........ :(
on a completely different note, life kind of sucks when the person you like so much will never know it........ :(
Monday, September 15, 2008
What are Obama's accomplishments? ....... still waiting..... yup. none. nada. nyetchovo. Although the left has been bashing Sarah Palin for her *inexperience*, the left has decided to carefully leave out the inexperience of their own presidential candidate. Obama has never been in control of any population (no, being the head of the Harvard newspaper does not count). In fact, he has not passed or authored any significant bill either. But let me tell you what he has done. He voted against extra funding for our troops in Iraq. He voted against the troop surge, which was absolutely a success (diminished terrorist attacks and casualties from those attacks significantly- the casualty levels in Iraq are the lowest they have been in FOUR years btw). Even some hardcore liberals opposed to the war from its start have admitted that this surge was a success. Obama will never admit he was wrong, because he knows that doing so will further uncover his lack of judgment (as if that werent fully unveiled during the Rev Wright controversy). He has been opposed to the war in Iraq, which liberated over 28 MILLION Iraqis from the genocidal grasp of Saddam Hussein, who was only too fond of using chemical weapons to murder Kurds. This was a cruel dictator who put those opposed to him into plastic shredders, feet first so they could feel the burst of pain before they die. I find it ironic and hypocritical that all the liberals are wearing those darn "save darfur" t-shirts (that money will never help those suffering in Darfur from the genocide- the only way to save those innocent people is to take military action against the Islamist dictatorship. Sending them limited supplies only prolongs their misery) but they don't apparently give a damn about the Iraqi civilians who were subject to genocide under Hussein's regime. Of course they wouldnt care. After all, they cannot possibly agree with a Republican adminsitration about anything. They care more about their political affiliation than the well-being of those suffering. Obama has also acted as a hypocrite repeatedly. He says he will bring *change* to DC, i agree 100%. Indeed, change for the worse. He and his campaign continuously launch personal attacks on McCain and his family but when McCain fires back, Obama pulls the *im a victim* card with his supporters. Obama himself has played the race card repeatedly, making himself the "underdog" by saying things such as, "doesn't look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills." He is using his ethnic background as a sensitive weapon against McCain, who cannot fire back because he will be labeled as a racist immediately if he does.
Saturday, September 13, 2008
Sarah Palin Interview- Edited by ABC
Sarah Palin had an interview with Charlie Gibson a few days back that received a lot of criticism. However, on the 11th, it surfaced that the interview shown on TV and online through ABC was cut and edited to portray Sarah Palin as indecisive and immature when it comes to foreign policy. Gibson grilled her more so than he did the Democratic presidential candidate, Obama. It angers and frustrates me to have so many left-leaning news networks, always eager to make Obama look like god himself and to make McCain and Palin look like idiots. This is without doubt the core of liberalism in my opinion: lies. The reality is that the complete interview (which can be seen at http://marklevinshow.com/gibson-interview/) shows that Palin has a stronger understanding of international relations then many would think. Although most Democrats and Liberals are trying to paint the image that "Palin isn't a threat, she's inexperienced, etc.." the polls show that Palin is giving McCain that huge extra boost in popularity he always needed. In fact, she has more executive experience than Obama, who has never been in control of any population. Even Palin's prior experience as a mayor of a town of about 7,000 exceeds all of Obama's executive experience. McCain made a wise decision without doubt. He chose a woman of strength, who despite being the main target of the Left for weeks, has been able to persevere. I "love" how the media portrays her as an incompetent in every field while they purposely leave out any negative information (and there's plenty of it) on Obama.
Russia.
Russia is behaving more aggressively then ever, invading a democratic state with disproportionate force, helping Iran develop its nuclear reactor so that the country's nuclear process would be "irreversible", and securing its military/ diplomatic ties with Syria and even, recently, Venezuela. They are without doubt doing these things to prove to the world that Russia is still a major world power. Perhaps even to provoke further tensions between the US and Russia. The fact that a Russian state-owned company is helping Iran develop a nuclear reactor will definitely lead to increased tensions. Putin, although no longer the president, is still the one who exerts power in Russia. Medvedev is nothing but a puppet, trained to always agree with and support Putin. This will have large repercussions for international relations. It seems like with every day, the world gets closer and closer to an all-out war. People have said that this an exagerration. But when Russia, a traditional foe of the US, is helping to develop nuclear institutions in a country that actively and openly sponsors terrorist networks, denies the Holocaust, and threatens to wipe Israel off the face of the earth even though several nations are trying to place sanctions on Iran as a way of making them stop their nuclear program, it seems like war is quite a possibility. Maybe even a solution. If this situation will deteriorate further, then it seems many Americans will vote for McCain in November. He has the military experience, the knowledge of war, and the confidence that I believe Americans would seek solace in. Those more idealistic about "world peace" will opt for Obama. But, his statement during the primaries, "Iran does not pose a threat to us", will come back to haunt him. His unfamiliarity with the military will be put under a magnifying class by his critics as McCain's experience will be met with ever-increasing acclaim. Most Americans, based on the past elections, would opt for the candidate who seems more defiant in the face of evil and terror, one who doesn't want to follow in Chamberlain's footsteps to appease dictators. But back to the Russia topic. Deteriorating relations between the US and Russia damage the world's war on radical Islamic terror organizations. Russia has an incredible amount of experience fighting Islamic terrorism in Chechnya and the surrounding regions. So does the US in Afghanistan and Iraq. If they were to only cooperate on Intelligence matters regarding terrorism, it would be incredibly beneficial to both sides. However, it seems pretty unrealistic. Putin and his "former" KGB henchmen are still in power. They don't give a damn about the welfare of their own people, and they only care about living amidst luxury and abundance while their citizens live in poverty. Their support of Iran's nuclear program and the improving relations between the two countries will most likely backfire on Russia. Maintaining relationships with a person such as Ahmadinejad can only lead to bad things.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)